Apr 09

SoThe following is an image that I worked on quite extentsiviley. Heres what I did;

  1. I layered the people - that way allowing them to remain in color
  2. Played with Hue / Saturation on the background image and this made the background black and white
  3. Then added contrast to the background - giving the background a darker coloring
  4. Then on the people, went with a blur tool to smooth any bad toning on the skin (this smooths the skin and also moves any hair from the skin which shines in the sun)
  5. Then the people are sharpened after the blurring to bring the skin effects back to reality (however, the skin remains more toned and balanced)

So now with that in mind, heres the peice of work;

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Apr 09

Hello,

Here is another image edit that I did. It was an image that I took with some friends and well, I found this one in particular amazing! Why?

  1. The background is blurred (naturally - no digital editing)
  2. Nature is present in the form of the blurred grass in the background, but also in the granite(y) kind of rock under the feet
  3. The feet - Amazing as they display the prints of the toes wonderfully - lies of a journey and on the leg you can see a foot bracelet made out of string which adds a natural toning to the image

Well now that I have explained why I like the original image so much, here is my edited version of “the feet”;

Tell me what you think, room for improvement? Where? Let me know.

Enjoy,

Noel Harrison

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Apr 07

I worked on two more images that were taken this evening near my house. I tried a few different things and here are the results. Please let me know what you think of them if you have a moment;

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Apr 07

If you are looking for an article that will bash Windows, this is not the article you are looking for and also if you dont have much time, I can sum my experience of Windows with a single word - Wow! I am a very strong “follower” of Apple and have removed Windows and PC’s from my life in general. However, I was interested in seeing what all the talk about Windows 7 was about. A good friend of mine (he is sold of Windows) convinced me to install it as my main operating system on my designers computer, which I let him do.

Although it is still in Beta, it has proven to be brilliant in every aspect of the word. In general it has the same clean and dynamic looks as Vista, but it is better. They have added many minor tweaks which makes it easier to make use of. One of the issues for me at first was the ugly start bar, but now that I am using it, it aint ugly anymore. When you delve deeper you also realise how much work they have put into something as simple as the start bar.

An application when running is displayed in a small square along the start bar. When moused over, all the active open windows running with the program show in a small thumbnail above the icon. Also when mousing over, you will notice that it takes the most used color in the logo and makes it the highlighed icon color. See screenshot below;

The start menu is alot like Vista, but the main thing that is so wonderful about this one is that the shut down button is the first button - unlike Vista where you had to click and go into a small menu to shutdown. It is that kind of minor tweaking which makes it so much better in my opinion.

On a more intellectual note, Windows 7 is by far more stable than any other Windows OS that I have ever used (with Windows ME or Vista ranking as the worst). As far as software compatibility goes, Windows 7 runs like a charm. One of the huge put offs for me with Windows Vista was the fact that I could plug a memory stick in and it would not be able to locate the driver and therefore I could not use the memory stick. It was terrible, I could not use devices that I needed to do the work that I do.

The computer that I am running Windows 7 on was built to run Vista. It only had a gigabyte of ram and Vista was heavy on the system resources. Windows 7 on the otherhand starts quickly and runs fast in general and also shuts down very quickly in comparison to my experience with Vista on the machine.

They have built in many useful small things such as libraries. This makes it easy to share files with other Windows 7 users. The networking controls have been improved dramatically - one of those things that many Vista users hated about Vista.

In closing, it is the same beautiful look of Vista, but this time it is backed by the stability and speed of OSX. What do you think, have you tried it - what will you be willing to pay for it?

Noel Harrison

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Apr 07

A few days ago I started to play with some images and wanted to see what kind of interesting effects I could apply to them. I took my own picture and black and whited it and left only the beach towel and shirt in full colour (however I did play with the contrast a bit). See below;

Then I decided to try with a friends image. In my opinion his turned out the best by far. I did more or less the same as I did with my own, but then decided to blur the background to add focus on the main person in the picture - him. See below;

Then lastly, someone saw what I was doing and asked me to make them one, so I did. But I took the person and made them black and white and kept the coloring for the background (played with the contrast again and also sharpened the image). See below;

So what do you think? Which one do you think looks the best. Room for improvement? Tell me.

Noel Harrison

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Mar 11

I thought that I would write about the statistics on my blog; how they are useful to me in a personal sense as well as in a business sense and what kind of information we collect from you as the user.

There are many great applications in order to collect this information, I personally use a system called AwStats - that is until I finnish developing my own personal system which I will be using on my clients websites (see my business at www.spinningyourweb.net).

In a personal way, it is useful to see what people are interested in reading - you are able to track what people searched for in order to find your blog, you are able to see where in the world the visits are coming from (for instance, this blog gets hits from - South Africa, United States, Argentina, Great Britain, Canada, Japan, Australia, Brazil, Russia, France and Germany to name a few). It also collects information about when my users are on the blog and for how long they are reading my blog. It also tells me where the hits came from - eg. other blogs and search engines. It is a good way to see how well your networking with other sites is working (Networking? Things such as your URL, link or reference to your blog on other online locations).

From a business perspective, these features are very helpful. You are able to aim your websites content towards the audience that is visiting your website. As far as countries go, it helps you to be able to target the appropriate languages to the appropriate groups of people. In business, it is important to know how many different (unique) people view a website a month and for how long they stay on the website. This gives you an understanding of approximately how many people are reading how much.

Anyway, heres what my blog has had in the last year or so; Unique hits: 2641, Page Views: 15421 and Visits: 2614. This is very low in comparison to most large websites, but I have detected a increase in hits over the last few months, so im excited to see what the next year or so holds as far as blogging goes.

Noel Harrison

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Mar 04

“This research assignment refers to the list of financial market events which displayed a destabilizing  of world economies that started at around the time of July 2007 and is currently still in play. This depression (or rather recession) in the world markets was initially tagged a “credit crunch” or a “credit crisis”. This names given the the current economic crisis explains what the issue was that originally led to the crisis and the now so tagged “credit crunch”.

This economic downturn has been ranked amongst the top in notable history. Economists are saying that this is the worst economic crisis / depression since the Great Depression in the late 1920’s which had a global effect.”

You can download the full document here. Please note that this work is the intellectual property of Noel Harrison and plagerism of it’s content is prohibited!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Feb 26

This evening I just attended a demo run of Tim Keller’s Microsoft DevDay presentation. He talks about Microsofts IIS and PHP and how they work together and also how PHP developers can intergrate their code with ASP.net, SQL and Silverlight. It looks like it is going to be a great presentation. I suggest that you book tickets (it is being presented in Cape Town, Johhanesburg and Durban).

For booking, please visit: http://www.microsoft.com/southafrica/devdays/default.mspx

Noel

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Feb 22

The following is a speech that I gave to my matric class on Starbucks. I titled the article “Capitalism in a cup”. I am sure this blog post will make is clear as to why I called it this. It has been published on;

- noelharrison.net
- sweetbru.com

Enjoy!

This December I was reading one of Taylor Clarks books. The title of this book is Starbucked. Its sub title is a double tall tale of caffeine, commerce and culture. If you have not yet worked out what this is about - its about Starbucks - the global coffee giant.

I think that it is important to understand  exactly how large Starbucks is to fully understand the power that Starbucks has over consumers and competitors. In 1987, Howard Shultz bought Starbucks. At this point there were only eleven Starbucks stores, within three years, Shultz had grown the number of stores to 85. Now, every year, Starbucks opens approximately two thousands stores world wide, that is an average of six new stores every single day around the globe.

At this point in time they have around thirteen thousand stores. In 1989 (two years after Shultz bought Starbucks), the United States only had 585 coffee shops. That is around 4.5% of the total number of stores that Starbucks had in 2007. That is However, they do not believe that they have yet hit the point of market saturation and they plan to have approximately 40 000 stores in the future of which 50% will be outside the borders of Northern America. This will make Starbucks the largest chain on the face of the planet.

Scientists have identified caffeine in lakes, bays and rivers in the United States of America which is an indication of the amount of coffee (or other caffeinated drinks) Americans consume daily. Starbucks has a habit of building stores within very close proximity to each other. A mall in Portland, Oregon is an example of this. There are two Starbucks stores within twelve feet of each other.

This is however not the first time Starbucks has done something of the sort. When Starbucks was still a small company, one of their stores in Vancouver was serving ten thousand customers a week and that was only customers that were able to make it into the doors of the shops. The lines were so long that they began to look for a location to place a second store. According to Shultz, as long as their are lines, it means that they need more stores, in the end they opened a store right across the road from another Starbucks. When questioned about this acquisition, The CEO who was Howard Shultz at the time said that this would get people talking about Starbucks - the shop that opens stores right across the road from each other. At the time, due to the size of the company, it helped to have any free advertising.

The interesting thing was that the new store did not cause any financial damage to the older one and in time these two stores became the top two preforming Starbucks stores.

Today Starbucks’ annual revenue is sitting around $7.8 billion. Starbucks serves an average of forty million customers every week. It has become more like a production line than a personal service. Due to the rapid expansion, shops come in a “mold” which make it easy to setup within a few days. The baristas need no experience as the machines do all the work now. All they have to do is know the menu, know the right questions to ask and the right buttons to press. As far as the stores go, they are designed to get people in and out. They need to be turning customers out at a every growing pace.

The question may be, why is Starbucks so appealing to people? According to the British Economic and Social Research Council, coffee houses are comforting and welcoming places which are suitable for groups or individuals. Other things that attract the masses to Starbucks is the carefully selected music for the different times of the day, the selection of tables and chairs. So the British Economic and Social Research Council concluded by stating that coffee houses appeal to a deeper level than it may appear. Another aspect which is true with just about all large chains is the fact that the products taste the same in the United States as they taste in Japan and China. Taylor Clark attributes the love for coffee on the fact that Americans now work approximately one hundred and twenty hours more a year then they did thirty five years ago. Americans are also getting around 20% less sleep per night than Americans a century ago. This leads to the feeling of the need of Caffeine and coffee is this in its most popular form.

As far as marketing goes, Starbucks has a brilliant setup. Every single cup of take away coffee that they sell is a piece of walking marketing. It holds the Starbucks design and logo on. The extent of this marketing is demonstrated when a women who had never drank Starbucks coffee said that Starbucks has really good coffee - the best you can get. The answer is simple, No, Starbucks does not have the best coffee, in fact they are making use of the cheap robusta beans. They then burn the beans to such an extent and that is why Starbucks is often referred to as Charbucks. In short their roast is very dark which makes the coffee very bitter.

However, one of the things that Starbucks does not advertise or market, is the way in which they treat the coffee bean farmers in Brazil, Ethiopia and Vietnam to name a few locations. Due to the American war on Communism in Vietnam, the Americans thought it necessary to pay of the moral debt. They did this by funding agriculture. The Vietnamese were encouraged to farm robusta trees. They were a lot cheaper to maintain and were really low quality. The Vietnamese market was so over loaded with bad quality beans that the large America companies - such as Starbucks were willing to pay very low prices to buy the beans cheap. This basically means that the large coffee companies are becoming richer while keeping the Vietnamese in poverty. Vietnam is now the worlds second largest producer behind Brazil.

Some of America’s plantations are bad, but Brazil has swiftly risen as the market leader, not only in the amounts produced, but also in the brutality towards the plantation workers. Starbucks very seldom voluntarily does much to help the struggling coffee farmers, but on rare occasions they have taken steps to try to help improve the lives of coffee farmers, but only when consumer groups begin to prepare for boycotts and protests.

According to one of the former Starbucks CEO’s, Orin Smith said, and I quote “We changed the way people live their lives, what they do when they get up in the morning, how the reward themselves, and where they meet”. Starbucks continues to grow exponentially according to Shultz and he says that they see no slow down in this as it is growing faster than ever before.

Starbucks often uses the “avalanche” effect in order to scare competitors. What this basically means is that Starbucks might open five new stores in a city in the period of one day in order to show their power to competitors.

There is a general misconception that big stores such as Starbucks put smaller family businesses out of business. This is however not true and according to the research and reports, they in fact stimulate growth.
Starbucks fights and they dont like to loose. This is evident when they approached a small Los Angeles coffee house owner and said flat out that if he did not sell out to Starbucks, that they would surround all of his stores. This coffee shop owner declined and refused to sell out. He says that Starbucks moving in next door to his shop was the best thing that could of happened to his business.  Starbucks creates a buzz which brings people from all over to the area of the shop. This boosted the small privately owned coffee houses sales dramatically.

Here’s an interesting statistic considering the Starbucks empire in the United States, 57% of American coffee houses are family owned.

Coffee is the worlds second most traded commodity. However when you add the Starbucks brand, experience and feeling, Coffee is no longer just a commodity. The United States, Starbucks’ largest market consumes approximately one third of the worlds supply of coffee (thats around 110 billion cups a year).

In closing, I would like to share a question that was asked in the Starbucked book; and it goes; which of the following locations does not have a Starbucks; a. Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, b. A Christian church in Indiana,  c. Beirut, Lebanon,  d. The town of Starbuck in Washington or e. The Great Wall of China

The answer is the town of Starbuck in Washington. It is in fact a location. It is a tiny eastern town in Washington which lies 40 miles away from the closest Starbucks.

Noel Harrison

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
Feb 05

Firstly, this blogs goals and aims are to promote conservative views and conservative topics as far as economics and politics goes. It is my personal blog, and even though I do extensive research into most of my blog posts, I will be taking a stand (very often a bias one too)- and the chances are it is not going to be the stand that the majority of the public will like. But should you be one of these people, I do not mind you displaying your disagreement on my blog, but please do it is a polite and generally accepted way.

At the beging of 2009, SweetBru.com asked me to publish my article “Hot Topic: Israel / Gaza”. This article received large viewership on this blog and created a large storm with certain readers. You may want to take a look at this article and maybe contribute a bit - http://sweetbru.com/2009/01/hot-topic-gaza-israel-noel-harrison/. Since then the owner of sweetbru.com has asked me to develop political and business related articles for his media site, so keep an eye on noelharrison.net as well as sweetbru.com.

I am in the process of developing and researching my next article, it surrounds Socialism and America, so that should be an interesting one, be sure to read it.

Noel Harrison

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon